Total
10626 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2002-1663 | 1 Monkey-project | 1 Monkey | 2020-03-26 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The Post_Method function in method.c for Monkey HTTP Daemon before 0.5.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a POST request with an invalid or missing Content-Length header value. | |||||
| CVE-2018-20335 | 1 Asus | 47 Asuswrt, Gt-ac2900, Gt-ac5300 and 44 more | 2020-03-24 | 7.8 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in ASUSWRT 3.0.0.4.384.20308. An unauthenticated user can trigger a DoS of the httpd service via the /APP_Installation.asp?= URI. | |||||
| CVE-2017-12842 | 1 Bitcoin | 1 Bitcoin Core | 2020-03-23 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Bitcoin Core before 0.14 allows an attacker to create an ostensibly valid SPV proof for a payment to a victim who uses an SPV wallet, even if that payment did not actually occur. Completing the attack would cost more than a million dollars, and is relevant mainly only in situations where an autonomous system relies solely on an SPV proof for transactions of a greater dollar amount. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10240 | 1 Joomla | 1 Joomla\! | 2020-03-19 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in Joomla! before 3.9.16. Missing length checks in the user table can lead to the creation of users with duplicate usernames and/or email addresses. | |||||
| CVE-2020-0526 | 1 Intel | 140 Compute Stick Stck1a32wfc, Compute Stick Stck1a32wfc Firmware, Compute Stick Stck1a8lfc and 137 more | 2020-03-18 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 6.7 MEDIUM |
| Improper input validation in firmware for Intel(R) NUC may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. The list of affected products is provided in intel-sa-00343: https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/security-center/advisory/intel-sa-00343.html | |||||
| CVE-2018-1000849 | 1 Alpinelinux | 1 Alpine Linux | 2020-03-18 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Alpine Linux version Versions prior to 2.6.10, 2.7.6, and 2.10.1 contains a Other/Unknown vulnerability in apk-tools (Alpine Linux' package manager) that can result in Remote Code Execution. This attack appear to be exploitable via A specially crafted APK-file can cause apk to write arbitrary data to an attacker-specified file, due to bugs in handling long link target name and the way a regular file is extracted.. This vulnerability appears to have been fixed in 2.6.10, 2.7.6, and 2.10.1. | |||||
| CVE-2020-8787 | 1 Salesagility | 1 Suitecrm | 2020-03-18 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| SuiteCRM 7.10.x versions prior to 7.10.23 and 7.11.x versions prior to 7.11.11 allow for an invalid Bean ID to be submitted. | |||||
| CVE-2018-19516 | 1 Kde | 1 Kde Applications | 2020-03-18 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| messagepartthemes/default/defaultrenderer.cpp in messagelib in KDE Applications before 18.12.0 does not properly restrict the handling of an http-equiv="REFRESH" value. | |||||
| CVE-2020-6965 | 1 Gehealthcare | 18 Apexpro Telemetry Server, Apexpro Telemetry Server Firmware, Carescape B450 Monitor and 15 more | 2020-03-17 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 9.9 CRITICAL |
| In ApexPro Telemetry Server Versions 4.2 and prior, CARESCAPE Telemetry Server v4.2 & prior, Clinical Information Center (CIC) Versions 4.X and 5.X, CARESCAPE Central Station (CSCS) Versions 1.X, B450 Version 2.X, B650 Version 1.X, B650 Version 2.X, B850 Version 1.X, B850 Version 2.X, a vulnerability in the software update mechanism allows an authenticated attacker to upload arbitrary files on the system through a crafted update package. | |||||
| CVE-2019-2216 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2020-03-17 | 4.4 MEDIUM | 7.3 HIGH |
| In overlay notifications, there is a possible hidden notification due to improper input validation. This could lead to a local escalation of privilege because the user is not notified of an overlaying app, with User execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.Product: Android Versions: Android-10 Android ID: A-38390530 | |||||
| CVE-2020-6963 | 1 Gehealthcare | 12 Apexpro Telemetry Server, Apexpro Telemetry Server Firmware, Carescape Central Station Mai700 and 9 more | 2020-03-17 | 10.0 HIGH | 10.0 CRITICAL |
| In ApexPro Telemetry Server Versions 4.2 and prior, CARESCAPE Telemetry Server v4.2 & prior, Clinical Information Center (CIC) Versions 4.X and 5.X, CARESCAPE Central Station (CSCS) Versions 1.X, the affected products utilized hard coded SMB credentials, which may allow an attacker to remotely execute arbitrary code. | |||||
| CVE-2020-6962 | 1 Gehealthcare | 18 Apexpro Telemetry Server, Apexpro Telemetry Server Firmware, Carescape B450 Monitor and 15 more | 2020-03-17 | 10.0 HIGH | 10.0 CRITICAL |
| In ApexPro Telemetry Server, Versions 4.2 and prior, CARESCAPE Telemetry Server v4.2 & prior, Clinical Information Center (CIC) Versions 4.X and 5.X, CARESCAPE Telemetry Server Version 4.3, CARESCAPE Central Station (CSCS) Versions 1.X CARESCAPE Central Station (CSCS) Versions 2.X, B450 Version 2.X, B650 Version 1.X, B650 Version 2.X, B850 Version 1.X, B850 Version 2.X, an input validation vulnerability exists in the web-based system configuration utility that could allow an attacker to obtain arbitrary remote code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10255 | 3 Micron, Samsung, Skhynix | 6 Ddr4 Sdram, Lpddr4, Ddr4 and 3 more | 2020-03-16 | 9.3 HIGH | 9.0 CRITICAL |
| Modern DRAM chips (DDR4 and LPDDR4 after 2015) are affected by a vulnerability in deployment of internal mitigations against RowHammer attacks known as Target Row Refresh (TRR), aka the TRRespass issue. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker needs to create certain access patterns to trigger bit flips on affected memory modules, aka a Many-sided RowHammer attack. This means that, even when chips advertised as RowHammer-free are used, attackers may still be able to conduct privilege-escalation attacks against the kernel, conduct privilege-escalation attacks against the Sudo binary, and achieve cross-tenant virtual-machine access by corrupting RSA keys. The issue affects chips produced by SK Hynix, Micron, and Samsung. NOTE: tracking DRAM supply-chain issues is not straightforward because a single product model from a single vendor may use DRAM chips from different manufacturers. | |||||
| CVE-2019-19279 | 1 Siemens | 2 Siprotec 4, Siprotec Compact | 2020-03-13 | 7.8 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIPROTEC 4 and SIPROTEC Compact relays equipped with EN100 Ethernet communication modules (All versions). Specially crafted packets sent to port 50000/UDP of the EN100 Ethernet communication modules could cause a Denial-of-Service of the affected device. A manual reboot is required to recover the service of the device. At the time of advisory publication no public exploitation of this security vulnerability was known to Siemens. | |||||
| CVE-2019-7589 | 1 Johnsoncontrols | 1 Entrapass | 2020-03-11 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A vulnerability with the SmartService API Service option exists whereby an unauthorized user could potentially exploit this to upload malicious code to the server that could be executed at system level privileges. This affects Johnson Controls' Kantech EntraPass Corporate Edition versions 8.0 and prior; Kantech EntraPass Global Edition versions 8.0 and prior. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9158 | 1 Siemens | 21 Simatic S7-300 Cpu 312, Simatic S7-300 Cpu 314, Simatic S7-300 Cpu 315-2 Dp and 18 more | 2020-03-10 | 7.8 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC S7-300 CPU family (All versions), SIMATIC S7-300 CPU family (incl. related ET200 CPUs and SIPLUS variants) (All versions), SIMATIC S7-400 PN/DP V6 and below CPU family (incl. SIPLUS variants) (All versions), SIMATIC S7-400 PN/DP V7 CPU family (incl. SIPLUS variants) (All versions), SIMATIC S7-400 V6 and earlier CPU family (All versions), SIMATIC S7-400 V7 CPU family (All versions). Specially crafted packets sent to port 80/tcp could cause the affected devices to go into defect mode. A cold restart is required to recover the system. | |||||
| CVE-2019-12433 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2020-03-10 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in GitLab Community and Enterprise Edition 11.7 through 11.11. It has Improper Input Validation. Restricted visibility settings allow creating internal projects in private groups, leading to multiple permission issues. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10236 | 1 Froxlor | 1 Froxlor | 2020-03-09 | 3.6 LOW | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in Froxlor before 0.10.14. It created files with static names in /tmp during installation if the installation directory was not writable. This allowed local attackers to cause DoS or disclose information out of the config files, because of _createUserdataConf in install/lib/class.FroxlorInstall.php. | |||||
| CVE-2020-3127 | 1 Cisco | 4 Webex Meetings, Webex Meetings Online, Webex Meetings Server and 1 more | 2020-03-05 | 9.3 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| Multiple vulnerabilities in Cisco Webex Network Recording Player for Microsoft Windows and Cisco Webex Player for Microsoft Windows could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code on an affected system. The vulnerabilities are due to insufficient validation of certain elements within a Webex recording that is stored in either the Advanced Recording Format (ARF) or the Webex Recording Format (WRF). An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending a malicious ARF or WRF file to a user through a link or email attachment and persuading the user to open the file on the local system. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code on the affected system with the privileges of the targeted user. | |||||
| CVE-2020-3128 | 1 Cisco | 4 Webex Meetings, Webex Meetings Online, Webex Meetings Server and 1 more | 2020-03-05 | 9.3 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| Multiple vulnerabilities in Cisco Webex Network Recording Player for Microsoft Windows and Cisco Webex Player for Microsoft Windows could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code on an affected system. The vulnerabilities are due to insufficient validation of certain elements within a Webex recording that is stored in either the Advanced Recording Format (ARF) or the Webex Recording Format (WRF). An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending a malicious ARF or WRF file to a user through a link or email attachment and persuading the user to open the file on the local system. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code on the affected system with the privileges of the targeted user. | |||||