Total
1727 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2018-17855 | 1 Joomla | 1 Joomla\! | 2020-08-24 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Joomla! before 3.8.13. If an attacker gets access to the mail account of an user who can approve admin verifications in the registration process, he can activate himself. | |||||
| CVE-2018-19608 | 1 Arm | 1 Mbed Tls | 2020-08-24 | 1.9 LOW | 4.7 MEDIUM |
| Arm Mbed TLS before 2.14.1, before 2.7.8, and before 2.1.17 allows a local unprivileged attacker to recover the plaintext of RSA decryption, which is used in RSA-without-(EC)DH(E) cipher suites. | |||||
| CVE-2019-7319 | 1 Cloudera | 1 Cdh | 2020-08-24 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.3 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Cloudera Hue 6.0.0 through 6.1.0. When using one of following authentication backends: LdapBackend, PamBackend, SpnegoDjangoBackend, RemoteUserDjangoBackend, SAML2Backend, OpenIDBackend, or OAuthBackend, external users are created with superuser privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2019-0301 | 1 Sap | 1 Identity Management | 2020-08-24 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Under certain conditions, it is possible to request the modification of role or privilege assignments through SAP Identity Management REST Interface Version 2, which would otherwise be restricted only for viewing. | |||||
| CVE-2019-15012 | 1 Atlassian | 1 Bitbucket | 2020-08-24 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Bitbucket Server and Bitbucket Data Center from version 4.13. before 5.16.11, from version 6.0.0 before 6.0.11, from version 6.1.0 before 6.1.9, from version 6.2.0 before 6.2.7, from version 6.3.0 before 6.3.6, from version 6.4.0 before 6.4.4, from version 6.5.0 before 6.5.3, from version 6.6.0 before 6.6.3, from version 6.7.0 before 6.7.3, from version 6.8.0 before 6.8.2, from version 6.9.0 before 6.9.1 had a Remote Code Execution vulnerability via the edit-file request. A remote attacker with write permission on a repository can write to any arbitrary file to the victims Bitbucket Server or Bitbucket Data Center instance using the edit-file endpoint, if the user has Bitbucket Server or Bitbucket Data Center running, and has the permission to write the file at that destination. In some cases, this can result in execution of arbitrary code by the victims Bitbucket Server or Bitbucket Data Center instance. | |||||
| CVE-2019-1007 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Windows 10, Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2019 | 2020-08-24 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| An elevation of privilege exists in Windows Audio Service, aka 'Windows Audio Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-1021, CVE-2019-1022, CVE-2019-1026, CVE-2019-1027, CVE-2019-1028. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11521 | 1 Open-xchange | 1 Open-xchange Appsuite | 2020-08-24 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| OX App Suite 7.10.1 allows Content Spoofing. | |||||
| CVE-2019-1010066 | 1 Llnl | 1 Model Specific Registers-safe | 2020-08-24 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory msr-safe v1.1.0 is affected by: Incorrect Access Control. The impact is: An attacker could modify model specific registers. The component is: ioctl handling. The attack vector is: An attacker could exploit a bug in ioctl interface whitelist checking, in order to write to model specific registers, normally a function reserved for the root user. The fixed version is: v1.2.0. | |||||
| CVE-2018-12261 | 1 Apollotechnologiesinc | 2 Momentum Axel 720p, Momentum Axel 720p Firmware | 2020-08-24 | 2.1 LOW | 4.4 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered on Momentum Axel 720P 5.1.8 devices. All processes run as root. | |||||
| CVE-2019-15332 | 1 Lavamobiles | 2 Z61, Z61 Firmware | 2020-08-24 | 2.1 LOW | 3.3 LOW |
| The Lava Z61 Android device with a build fingerprint of LAVA/Z61_2GB/Z61_2GB:8.1.0/O11019/1533889281:user/release-keys contains a pre-installed app with a package name of com.android.lava.powersave app (versionCode=400, versionName=v4.0.27) that allows any app co-located on the device to programmatically disable and enable Wi-Fi without the corresponding access permission through an exported interface. | |||||
| CVE-2019-6668 | 1 F5 | 1 Big-ip Access Policy Manager | 2020-08-24 | 4.9 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| The BIG-IP APM Edge Client for macOS bundled with BIG-IP APM 15.0.0-15.0.1, 14.1.0-14.1.0.5, 14.0.0-14.0.0.4, 13.1.0-13.1.1.5, 12.1.0-12.1.5, and 11.5.1-11.6.5 may allow unprivileged users to access files owned by root. | |||||
| CVE-2018-15557 | 1 Actiontec | 2 Web6000q, Web6000q Firmware | 2020-08-24 | 10.0 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in the Quantenna WiFi Controller on Telus Actiontec WEB6000Q v1.1.02.22 devices. An attacker can statically set his/her IP to anything on the 169.254.1.0/24 subnet, and obtain root access by connecting to 169.254.1.2 port 23 with telnet/netcat. | |||||
| CVE-2019-12794 | 1 Misp | 1 Misp | 2020-08-24 | 6.0 MEDIUM | 6.6 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in MISP 2.4.108. Organization admins could reset credentials for site admins (organization admins have the inherent ability to reset passwords for all of their organization's users). This, however, could be abused in a situation where the host organization of an instance creates organization admins. An organization admin could set a password manually for the site admin or simply use the API key of the site admin to impersonate them. The potential for abuse only occurs when the host organization creates lower-privilege organization admins instead of the usual site admins. Also, only organization admins of the same organization as the site admin could abuse this. | |||||
| CVE-2018-15331 | 1 F5 | 1 Big-ip Application Acceleration Manager | 2020-08-24 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| On BIG-IP AAM 13.0.0 or 12.1.0-12.1.3.7, the dcdb_convert utility used by BIG-IP AAM fails to drop group permissions when executing helper scripts, which could be used to leverage attacks against the BIG-IP system. | |||||
| CVE-2019-6794 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2020-08-24 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in GitLab Community and Enterprise Edition before 11.5.8, 11.6.x before 11.6.6, and 11.7.x before 11.7.1. It allows Information Disclosure (issue 5 of 6). A project guest user can view the last commit status of the default branch. | |||||
| CVE-2019-12176 | 1 Htc | 1 Viveport | 2020-08-24 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| Privilege escalation in the "HTC Account Service" and "ViveportDesktopService" in HTC VIVEPORT before 1.0.0.36 allows local attackers to escalate privileges to SYSTEM via reconfiguration of either service. | |||||
| CVE-2019-4465 | 1 Ibm | 1 Cloud Pak System | 2020-08-24 | 2.1 LOW | 3.3 LOW |
| IBM Cloud Pak System 2.3 and 2.3.0.1 allows web pages to be stored locally which can be read by another user on the system. IBM X-Force ID: 163774. | |||||
| CVE-2019-12889 | 1 Sailpoint | 1 Desktop Password Reset | 2020-08-24 | 6.9 MEDIUM | 7.0 HIGH |
| An unauthenticated privilege escalation exists in SailPoint Desktop Password Reset 7.2. A user with local access to only the Windows logon screen can escalate their privileges to NT AUTHORITY\System. An attacker would need local access to the machine for a successful exploit. The attacker must disconnect the computer from the local network / WAN and connect it to an internet facing access point / network. At that point, the attacker can execute the password-reset functionality, which will expose a web browser. Browsing to a site that calls local Windows system functions (e.g., file upload) will expose the local file system. From there an attacker can launch a privileged command shell. | |||||
| CVE-2019-1000 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Azure Active Directory Connect | 2020-08-24 | 3.5 LOW | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Microsoft Azure Active Directory Connect build 1.3.20.0, which allows an attacker to execute two PowerShell cmdlets in context of a privileged account, and perform privileged actions.To exploit this, an attacker would need to authenticate to the Azure AD Connect server, aka 'Microsoft Azure AD Connect Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11553 | 1 Code42 | 1 Code42 | 2020-08-24 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| In Code42 for Enterprise through 6.8.4, an administrator without web restore permission but with the ability to manage users in an organization can impersonate a user with web restore permission. When requesting the token to do a web restore, an administrator with permission to manage a user could request the token of that user. If the administrator was not authorized to perform web restores but the user was authorized to perform web restores, this would allow the administrator to impersonate the user with greater permissions. In order to exploit this vulnerability, the user would have to be an administrator with access to manage an organization with a user with greater permissions than themselves. | |||||