Total
976 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-32069 | 1 Mitel | 1 Micollab | 2021-08-23 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 4.8 MEDIUM |
| The AWV component of Mitel MiCollab before 9.3 could allow an attacker to perform a Man-In-the-Middle attack due to improper TLS negotiation. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to view and modify data. | |||||
| CVE-2021-32581 | 1 Acronis | 3 Cyber Protect Cloud, Cyber Protection Agent, True Image | 2021-08-12 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| Acronis True Image prior to 2021 Update 4 for Windows, Acronis True Image prior to 2021 Update 5 for Mac, Acronis Agent prior to build 26653, Acronis Cyber Protect prior to build 27009 did not implement SSL certificate validation. | |||||
| CVE-2017-6594 | 2 Heimdal Project, Opensuse | 2 Heimdal, Leap | 2021-08-12 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| The transit path validation code in Heimdal before 7.3 might allow attackers to bypass the capath policy protection mechanism by leveraging failure to add the previous hop realm to the transit path of issued tickets. | |||||
| CVE-2018-0786 | 1 Microsoft | 10 .net Core, .net Framework, Powershell Core and 7 more | 2021-08-12 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 SP2, 3.0 SP2, 3.5, 3.5.1, 4.5.2, 4.6, 4.6.1, 4.6.2, 4.7, 4.7.1, .NET Core 1.0 and 2.0, and PowerShell Core 6.0.0 allow a security feature bypass vulnerability due to the way certificates are validated, aka ".NET Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability." | |||||
| CVE-2021-35193 | 1 Pattersondental | 1 Eaglesoft | 2021-08-11 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Patterson Application Service in Patterson Eaglesoft 18 through 21 accepts the same certificate authentication across different customers' installations (that have the same software version). This provides remote access to SQL database credentials. (In the normal use of the product, retrieving those credentials only occurs after a username/password authentication step; however, this authentication step is on the client side, and an attacker can develop their own client that skips this step.) | |||||
| CVE-2021-31892 | 1 Siemens | 20 Sinumerik Analyse Mycondition, Sinumerik Analyse Mycondition Firmware, Sinumerik Analyze Myperformance and 17 more | 2021-08-09 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 7.4 HIGH |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SINUMERIK Analyse MyCondition (All versions), SINUMERIK Analyze MyPerformance (All versions), SINUMERIK Analyze MyPerformance /OEE-Monitor (All versions), SINUMERIK Analyze MyPerformance /OEE-Tuning (All versions), SINUMERIK Integrate Client 02 (All versions >= V02.00.12 < 02.00.18), SINUMERIK Integrate Client 03 (All versions >= V03.00.12 < 03.00.18), SINUMERIK Integrate Client 04 (V04.00.02 and all versions >= V04.00.15 < 04.00.18), SINUMERIK Integrate for Production 4.1 (All versions < V4.1 SP10 HF3), SINUMERIK Integrate for Production 5.1 (V5.1), SINUMERIK Manage MyMachines (All versions), SINUMERIK Manage MyMachines /Remote (All versions), SINUMERIK Manage MyMachines /Spindel Monitor (All versions), SINUMERIK Manage MyPrograms (All versions), SINUMERIK Manage MyResources /Programs (All versions), SINUMERIK Manage MyResources /Tools (All versions), SINUMERIK Manage MyTools (All versions), SINUMERIK Operate V4.8 (All versions < V4.8 SP8), SINUMERIK Operate V4.93 (All versions < V4.93 HF7), SINUMERIK Operate V4.94 (All versions < V4.94 HF5), SINUMERIK Optimize MyProgramming /NX-Cam Editor (All versions). Due to an error in a third-party dependency the ssl flags used for setting up a TLS connection to a server are overwitten with wrong settings. This results in a missing validation of the server certificate and thus in a possible TLS MITM szenario. | |||||
| CVE-2020-12681 | 1 3xlogic | 2 Infinias Eidc32, Infinias Eidc32 Firmware | 2021-08-05 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Missing TLS certificate validation on 3xLogic Infinias eIDC32 devices through 3.4.125 allows an attacker to intercept/control the channel by which door lock policies are applied. | |||||
| CVE-2020-9321 | 1 Traefik | 1 Traefik | 2021-07-28 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| configurationwatcher.go in Traefik 2.x before 2.1.4 and TraefikEE 2.0.0 mishandles the purging of certificate contents from providers before logging. | |||||
| CVE-2019-20894 | 1 Traefik | 1 Traefik | 2021-07-28 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Traefik 2.x, in certain configurations, allows HTTPS sessions to proceed without mutual TLS verification in a situation where ERR_BAD_SSL_CLIENT_AUTH_CERT should have occurred. | |||||
| CVE-2019-12000 | 1 Hp | 1 Mse Msg Gw Application E-ltu | 2021-07-21 | 5.4 MEDIUM | 6.6 MEDIUM |
| HPE has found a potential Remote Access Restriction Bypass in HPE MSE Msg Gw application E-LTU prior to version 3.2 when HTTPS is used between the USSD and an external USSD service logic application. Update to version 3.2 and update the HTTPS configuration as described in the HPE MSE Messaging Gateway Configuration and Operations Guide. | |||||
| CVE-2020-15526 | 1 Red-gate | 1 Sql Monitor | 2021-07-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| In Redgate SQL Monitor 7.1.4 through 10.1.6 (inclusive), the scope for disabling some TLS security certificate checks can extend beyond that defined by various options on the Configuration > Notifications pages to disable certificate checking for alert notifications. These TLS security checks are also ignored during monitoring of VMware machines. This would make SQL Monitor vulnerable to potential man-in-the-middle attacks when sending alert notification emails, posting to Slack or posting to webhooks. The vulnerability is fixed in version 10.1.7. | |||||
| CVE-2020-15604 | 2 Microsoft, Trendmicro | 6 Windows, Antivirus\+ 2019, Internet Security 2019 and 3 more | 2021-07-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An incomplete SSL server certification validation vulnerability in the Trend Micro Security 2019 (v15) consumer family of products could allow an attacker to combine this vulnerability with another attack to trick an affected client into downloading a malicious update instead of the expected one. CWE-494: Update files are not properly verified. | |||||
| CVE-2020-4791 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Identity Governance And Intelligence | 2021-07-21 | 1.8 LOW | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence 5.2.6 could allow an attacker to obtain sensitive information using main in the middle attacks due to improper certificate validation. IBM X-Force ID: 189379. | |||||
| CVE-2020-13955 | 1 Apache | 1 Calcite | 2021-07-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| HttpUtils#getURLConnection method disables explicitly hostname verification for HTTPS connections making clients vulnerable to man-in-the-middle attacks. Calcite uses internally this method to connect with Druid and Splunk so information leakage may happen when using the respective Calcite adapters. The method itself is in a utility class so people may use it to create vulnerable HTTPS connections for other applications. From Apache Calcite 1.26 onwards, the hostname verification will be performed using the default JVM truststore. | |||||
| CVE-2020-24619 | 1 Meltytech | 1 Shotcut | 2021-07-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| In mainwindow.cpp in Shotcut before 20.09.13, the upgrade check misuses TLS because of setPeerVerifyMode(QSslSocket::VerifyNone). A man-in-the-middle attacker could offer a spoofed download resource. | |||||
| CVE-2019-8531 | 1 Apple | 3 Iphone Os, Mac Os X, Watchos | 2021-07-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A validation issue existed in Trust Anchor Management. This issue was addressed with improved validation. This issue is fixed in watchOS 5.2, macOS Mojave 10.14.4, Security Update 2019-002 High Sierra, Security Update 2019-002 Sierra, iOS 12.2. An untrusted radius server certificate may be trusted. | |||||
| CVE-2021-32755 | 2 Apple, Wire | 2 Iphone Os, Wire | 2021-07-16 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Wire is a collaboration platform. wire-ios-transport handles authentication of requests, network failures, and retries for the iOS implementation of Wire. In the 3.82 version of the iOS application, a new web socket implementation was introduced for users running iOS 13 or higher. This new websocket implementation is not configured to enforce certificate pinning when available. Certificate pinning for the new websocket is enforced in version 3.84 or above. | |||||
| CVE-2021-36371 | 1 Getambassador | 1 Emissary-ingress | 2021-07-14 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 3.7 LOW |
| Emissary-Ingress (formerly Ambassador API Gateway) through 1.13.9 allows attackers to bypass client certificate requirements (i.e., mTLS cert_required) on backend upstreams when more than one TLSContext is defined and at least one configuration exists that does not require client certificate authentication. The attacker must send an SNI specifying an unprotected backend and an HTTP Host header specifying a protected backend. (2.x versions are unaffected. 1.x versions are unaffected with certain configuration settings involving prune_unreachable_routes and a wildcard Host resource.) | |||||
| CVE-2021-32727 | 1 Nextcloud | 1 Nextcloud | 2021-07-14 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Nextcloud Android Client is the Android client for Nextcloud. Clients using the Nextcloud end-to-end encryption feature download the public and private key via an API endpoint. In versions prior to 3.16.1, the Nextcloud Android client skipped a step that involved the client checking if a private key belonged to a previously downloaded public certificate. If the Nextcloud instance served a malicious public key, the data would be encrypted for this key and thus could be accessible to a malicious actor. The vulnerability is patched in version 3.16.1. As a workaround, do not add additional end-to-end encrypted devices to a user account. | |||||
| CVE-2021-1134 | 1 Cisco | 1 Dna Center | 2021-07-02 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 7.4 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in the Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) integration feature of the Cisco DNA Center Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to gain unauthorized access to sensitive data. The vulnerability is due to an incomplete validation of the X.509 certificate used when establishing a connection between DNA Center and an ISE server. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by supplying a crafted certificate and could then intercept communications between the ISE and DNA Center. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to view and alter sensitive information that the ISE maintains about clients that are connected to the network. | |||||