Total
976 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-2648 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Ssh Slaves | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 5.6 MEDIUM |
| It was found that jenkins-ssh-slaves-plugin before version 1.15 did not perform host key verification, thereby enabling Man-in-the-Middle attacks. | |||||
| CVE-2017-2629 | 1 Haxx | 1 Curl | 2019-10-09 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| curl before 7.53.0 has an incorrect TLS Certificate Status Request extension feature that asks for a fresh proof of the server's certificate's validity in the code that checks for a test success or failure. It ends up always thinking there's valid proof, even when there is none or if the server doesn't support the TLS extension in question. This could lead to users not detecting when a server's certificate goes invalid or otherwise be mislead that the server is in a better shape than it is in reality. This flaw also exists in the command line tool (--cert-status). | |||||
| CVE-2017-2623 | 2 Redhat, Rpm-ostree | 3 Enterprise Linux, Rpm-ostree, Rpm-ostree-client | 2019-10-09 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| It was discovered that rpm-ostree and rpm-ostree-client before 2017.3 fail to properly check GPG signatures on packages when doing layering. Packages with unsigned or badly signed content could fail to be rejected as expected. This issue is partially mitigated on RHEL Atomic Host, where certificate pinning is used by default. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1622 | 1 Ibm | 1 Qradar Incident Forensics | 2019-10-09 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 7.4 HIGH |
| IBM QRadar SIEM 7.2.8 and 7.3 does not validate, or incorrectly validates, a certificate. This weakness might allow an attacker to spoof a trusted entity by using a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack. IBM X-force ID: 133120. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1265 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2019-10-09 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0, 10.0.1, 10.1, 10.1.2, 10.1.3, 10.1.4, and 10.5 does not validate, or incorrectly validates, a certificate. This weakness might allow an attacker to spoof a trusted entity by using a man-in-the-middle (MITM) techniques. IBM X-Force ID: 124740. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1200 | 1 Ibm | 1 Bigfix Compliance | 2019-10-09 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| IBM BigFix Compliance 1.7 through 1.9.91 (TEMA SUAv1 SCA SCM) does not validate, or incorrectly validates, a certificate.This weakness might allow an attacker to spoof a trusted entity by using a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack. The software might connect to a malicious host while believing it is a trusted host, or the software might be deceived into accepting spoofed data that appears to originate from a trusted host. IBM X-Force ID: 123675. | |||||
| CVE-2017-13105 | 1 Hisecuritylab | 1 Virus Cleaner | 2019-10-09 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| Hi Security Virus Cleaner - Antivirus, Booster, 3.7.1.1329, 2017-09-13, Android application accepts all SSL certificates during SSL communication. This opens the application up to a man-in-the-middle attack having all of its encrypted traffic intercepted and read by an attacker. | |||||
| CVE-2017-13083 | 1 Rufus Project | 1 Rufus | 2019-10-09 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| Akeo Consulting Rufus prior to version 2.17.1187 does not adequately validate the integrity of updates downloaded over HTTP, allowing an attacker to easily convince a user to execute arbitrary code | |||||
| CVE-2017-12228 | 1 Cisco | 2 Ios, Ios Xe | 2019-10-09 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability in the Cisco Network Plug and Play application of Cisco IOS 12.4 through 15.6 and Cisco IOS XE 3.3 through 16.4 could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to gain unauthorized access to sensitive data by using an invalid certificate. The vulnerability is due to insufficient certificate validation by the affected software. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by supplying a crafted certificate to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to conduct man-in-the-middle attacks to decrypt confidential information on user connections to the affected software. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvc33171. | |||||
| CVE-2017-10620 | 1 Juniper | 21 Junos, Srx100, Srx110 and 18 more | 2019-10-09 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 7.4 HIGH |
| Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX series devices do not verify the HTTPS server certificate before downloading anti-virus updates. This may allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to inject bogus signatures to cause service disruptions or make the device not detect certain types of attacks. Affected Junos OS releases are: 12.1X46 prior to 12.1X46-D71; 12.3X48 prior to 12.3X48-D55; 15.1X49 prior to 15.1X49-D110; | |||||
| CVE-2016-6562 | 1 Mitel | 1 Shortel Mobility Client | 2019-10-09 | 2.9 LOW | 7.5 HIGH |
| On iOS and Android devices, the ShoreTel Mobility Client app version 9.1.3.109 fails to properly validate SSL certificates provided by HTTPS connections, which means that an attacker in the position to perform MITM attacks may be able to obtain sensitive account information such as login credentials. | |||||
| CVE-2016-2922 | 1 Ibm | 1 Rational Clearquest | 2019-10-09 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| IBM Rational ClearQuest 8.0 through 8.0.1.9 and 9.0 through 9.0.1.3 (CQ OSLC linkages, EmailRelay) fails to check the SSL certificate against the requested hostname. It is subject to a man-in-the-middle attack with an impersonating server observing all the data transmitted to the real server. IBM X-Force ID: 113353. | |||||
| CVE-2016-10536 | 1 Socket | 1 Engine.io-client | 2019-10-09 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| engine.io-client is the client for engine.io, the implementation of a transport-based cross-browser/cross-device bi-directional communication layer for Socket.IO. The vulnerability is related to the way that node.js handles the `rejectUnauthorized` setting. If the value is something that evaluates to false, certificate verification will be disabled. This is problematic as engine.io-client 1.6.8 and earlier passes in an object for settings that includes the rejectUnauthorized property, whether it has been set or not. If the value has not been explicitly changed, it will be passed in as `null`, resulting in certificate verification being turned off. | |||||
| CVE-2016-10534 | 1 Electron-packager Project | 1 Electron-packager | 2019-10-09 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| electron-packager is a command line tool that packages Electron source code into `.app` and `.exe` packages. along with Electron. The `--strict-ssl` command line option in electron-packager >= 5.2.1 <= 6.0.0 || >=6.0.0 <= 6.0.2 defaults to false if not explicitly set to true. This could allow an attacker to perform a man in the middle attack. | |||||
| CVE-2019-16263 | 1 Twitter | 1 Twitter Kit | 2019-10-09 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 7.4 HIGH |
| The Twitter Kit framework through 3.4.2 for iOS does not properly validate the api.twitter.com SSL certificate. Although the certificate chain must contain one of a set of pinned certificates, there are certain implementation errors such as a lack of hostname verification. NOTE: this is an end-of-life product. | |||||
| CVE-2019-15042 | 1 Jetbrains | 1 Teamcity | 2019-10-07 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in JetBrains TeamCity 2018.2.4. It had no SSL certificate validation for some external https connections. This was fixed in TeamCity 2019.1. | |||||
| CVE-2017-14710 | 1 Shein | 1 Shein-fashion Shopping Online | 2019-10-03 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| The Shein Group Ltd. "SHEIN - Fashion Shopping" app -- aka shein fashion-shopping/id878577184 -- for iOS does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate. | |||||
| CVE-2017-0248 | 1 Microsoft | 1 .net Framework | 2019-10-03 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0, 3.5, 3.5.1, 4.5.2, 4.6, 4.6.1, 4.6.2 and 4.7 allow an attacker to bypass Enhanced Security Usage taggings when they present a certificate that is invalid for a specific use, aka ".NET Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability." | |||||
| CVE-2018-10404 | 1 Objective-see | 5 Knockknock, Lulu, Procinfo and 2 more | 2019-10-03 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Objective-See KnockKnock, LuLu, TaskExplorer, WhatsYourSign, and procInfo. A maliciously crafted Universal/fat binary can evade third-party code signing checks. By not completing full inspection of the Universal/fat binary, the user of the third-party tool will believe that the code is signed by Apple, but the malicious unsigned code will execute. | |||||
| CVE-2017-17301 | 1 Huawei | 56 Ar120-s, Ar120-s Firmware, Ar1200 and 53 more | 2019-10-03 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Huawei AR120-S V200R005C32, V200R006C10, V200R007C00, V200R008C20, AR1200 V200R005C20, V200R005C32, V200R006C10, V200R007C00, V200R007C01, V200R007C02, V200R008C20, AR1200-S V200R005C32, V200R006C10, V200R007C00, V200R008C20, AR150 V200R006C10, V200R007C00, V200R007C01, V200R007C02, V200R008C20, AR160 V200R005C32, V200R006C10, V200R007C00, V200R007C01, V200R007C02, V200R008C20, AR200 V200R005C32, V200R006C10, V200R007C00, V200R007C01, V200R008C20, AR200-S V200R005C32, V200R006C10, V200R007C00, V200R008C20, AR2200 V200R005C20, V200R005C32, V200R006C10, V200R007C00, V200R007C01, V200R007C02, V200R008C20, AR2200-S V200R005C32, V200R006C10, V200R007C00, V200R008C20, AR3200 V200R005C32, V200R006C10, V200R006C11, V200R007C00, V200R007C01, V200R007C02, V200R008C00, V200R008C10, V200R008C20, V200R008C30, AR3600 V200R006C10, V200R007C00, V200R007C01, V200R008C20, AR510 V200R005C32, V200R006C10, V200R007C00, V200R008C20, CloudEngine 12800 V100R003C00, V100R003C10, V100R005C00, V100R005C10, V100R006C00, V200R001C00, CloudEngine 5800 V100R003C00, V100R003C10, V100R005C00, V100R005C10, V100R006C00, V200R001C00, CloudEngine 6800 V100R003C00, V100R003C10, V100R005C00, V100R005C10, V100R006C00, V200R001C00, CloudEngine 7800 V100R003C00, V100R003C10, V100R005C00, V100R005C10, V100R006C00, V200R001C00, DP300 V500R002C00, SMC2.0 V100R003C10, V100R005C00, V500R002C00, SRG1300 V200R005C32, V200R006C10, V200R007C00, V200R007C02, V200R008C20, SRG2300 V200R005C32, V200R006C10, V200R007C00, V200R007C02, V200R008C20, SRG3300 V200R005C32, V200R006C10, V200R007C00, V200R008C20, TE30 V100R001C10, TE60 V100R003C00, V500R002C00, VP9660 V200R001C02, V200R001C30, V500R002C00, ViewPoint 8660 V100R008C02, V100R008C03, eSpace IAD V300R002C01, eSpace U1981 V200R003C20, V200R003C30, eSpace USM V100R001C01, V300R001C00 have a weak cryptography vulnerability. Due to not properly some values in the certificates, an unauthenticated remote attacker could forges a specific RSA certificate and exploits the vulnerability to pass identity authentication and logs into the target device to obtain permissions configured for the specific user name. | |||||