Total
976 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-22939 | 5 Debian, Netapp, Nodejs and 2 more | 8 Debian Linux, Nextgen Api, Node.js and 5 more | 2024-01-05 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| If the Node.js https API was used incorrectly and "undefined" was in passed for the "rejectUnauthorized" parameter, no error was returned and connections to servers with an expired certificate would have been accepted. | |||||
| CVE-2023-5594 | 1 Eset | 9 Endpoint Antivirus, Endpoint Security, File Security and 6 more | 2024-01-04 | N/A | 8.6 HIGH |
| Improper validation of the server’s certificate chain in secure traffic scanning feature considered intermediate certificate signed using the MD5 or SHA1 algorithm as trusted. | |||||
| CVE-2023-51662 | 1 Snowflake | 1 Snowflake Connector | 2024-01-03 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| The Snowflake .NET driver provides an interface to the Microsoft .NET open source software framework for developing applications. Snowflake recently received a report about a vulnerability in the Snowflake Connector .NET where the checks against the Certificate Revocation List (CRL) were not performed where the insecureMode flag was set to false, which is the default setting. The vulnerability affects versions between 2.0.25 and 2.1.4 (inclusive). Snowflake fixed the issue in version 2.1.5. | |||||
| CVE-2023-46724 | 1 Squid-cache | 1 Squid | 2023-12-29 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Squid is a caching proxy for the Web. Due to an Improper Validation of Specified Index bug, Squid versions 3.3.0.1 through 5.9 and 6.0 prior to 6.4 compiled using `--with-openssl` are vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack against SSL Certificate validation. This problem allows a remote server to perform Denial of Service against Squid Proxy by initiating a TLS Handshake with a specially crafted SSL Certificate in a server certificate chain. This attack is limited to HTTPS and SSL-Bump. This bug is fixed in Squid version 6.4. In addition, patches addressing this problem for the stable releases can be found in Squid's patch archives. Those who you use a prepackaged version of Squid should refer to the package vendor for availability information on updated packages. | |||||
| CVE-2023-1514 | 1 Hitachienergy | 1 Rtu500 Scripting Interface | 2023-12-28 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A vulnerability exists in the component RTU500 Scripting interface. When a client connects to a server using TLS, the server presents a certificate. This certificate links a public key to the identity of the service and is signed by a Certification Authority (CA), allowing the client to validate that the remote service can be trusted and is not malicious. If the client does not validate the parameters of the certificate, then attackers could be able to spoof the identity of the service. An attacker could exploit the vulnerability by using faking the identity of a RTU500 device and intercepting the messages initiated via the RTU500 Scripting interface. | |||||
| CVE-2021-43882 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Defender For Iot | 2023-12-28 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Microsoft Defender for IoT Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | |||||
| CVE-2020-35662 | 3 Debian, Fedoraproject, Saltstack | 3 Debian Linux, Fedora, Salt | 2023-12-21 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 7.4 HIGH |
| In SaltStack Salt before 3002.5, when authenticating to services using certain modules, the SSL certificate is not always validated. | |||||
| CVE-2020-28972 | 3 Debian, Fedoraproject, Saltstack | 3 Debian Linux, Fedora, Salt | 2023-12-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| In SaltStack Salt before 3002.5, authentication to VMware vcenter, vsphere, and esxi servers (in the vmware.py files) does not always validate the SSL/TLS certificate. | |||||
| CVE-2022-21836 | 1 Microsoft | 9 Windows 10, Windows 11, Windows 7 and 6 more | 2023-12-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| Windows Certificate Spoofing Vulnerability | |||||
| CVE-2022-26923 | 1 Microsoft | 7 Windows 10, Windows 11, Windows 8.1 and 4 more | 2023-12-21 | 9.0 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| Active Directory Domain Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | |||||
| CVE-2023-6680 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2023-12-19 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| An improper certificate validation issue in Smartcard authentication in GitLab EE affecting all versions from 11.6 prior to 16.4.4, 16.5 prior to 16.5.4, and 16.6 prior to 16.6.2 allows an attacker to authenticate as another user given their public key if they use Smartcard authentication. Smartcard authentication is an experimental feature and has to be manually enabled by an administrator. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9952 | 2 Haxx, Microsoft | 2 Curl, Windows Embedded Compact | 2023-12-15 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| The verify_certificate function in lib/vtls/schannel.c in libcurl 7.30.0 through 7.51.0, when built for Windows CE using the schannel TLS backend, makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct man-in-the-middle attacks via a crafted wildcard SAN in a server certificate, as demonstrated by "*.com." | |||||
| CVE-2009-4123 | 1 Jruby | 1 Jruby-openssl | 2023-12-14 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| The jruby-openssl gem before 0.6 for JRuby mishandles SSL certificate validation. | |||||
| CVE-2023-48427 | 1 Siemens | 1 Sinec Ins | 2023-12-14 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SINEC INS (All versions < V1.0 SP2 Update 2). Affected products do not properly validate the certificate of the configured UMC server. This could allow an attacker to intercept credentials that are sent to the UMC server as well as to manipulate responses, potentially allowing an attacker to escalate privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2023-30222 | 1 4d | 1 Server | 2023-12-14 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| An information disclosure vulnerability in 4D SAS 4D Server Application v17, v18, v19 R7 and earlier allows attackers to retrieve password hashes for all users via eavesdropping. | |||||
| CVE-2023-50454 | 1 Zammad | 1 Zammad | 2023-12-13 | N/A | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in Zammad before 6.2.0. In several subsystems, SSL/TLS was used to establish connections to external services without proper validation of hostname and certificate authority. This is exploitable by man-in-the-middle attackers. | |||||
| CVE-2023-49247 | 1 Huawei | 2 Emui, Harmonyos | 2023-12-12 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Permission verification vulnerability in distributed scenarios. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may affect service confidentiality. | |||||
| CVE-2021-42017 | 1 Siemens | 54 Ruggedcom I800, Ruggedcom I801, Ruggedcom I802 and 51 more | 2023-12-12 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM i800, RUGGEDCOM i801, RUGGEDCOM i802, RUGGEDCOM i803, RUGGEDCOM M2100, RUGGEDCOM M2100F, RUGGEDCOM M2200, RUGGEDCOM M2200F, RUGGEDCOM M969, RUGGEDCOM M969F, RUGGEDCOM RMC30, RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RP110, RUGGEDCOM RS1600, RUGGEDCOM RS1600F, RUGGEDCOM RS1600T, RUGGEDCOM RS400, RUGGEDCOM RS400F, RUGGEDCOM RS401, RUGGEDCOM RS416, RUGGEDCOM RS416F, RUGGEDCOM RS416P, RUGGEDCOM RS416PF, RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS8000, RUGGEDCOM RS8000A, RUGGEDCOM RS8000H, RUGGEDCOM RS8000T, RUGGEDCOM RS900, RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900F, RUGGEDCOM RS900G, RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900GF, RUGGEDCOM RS900GP, RUGGEDCOM RS900GPF, RUGGEDCOM RS900L, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-GETS-C01, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-GETS-XX, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-STND-C01, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-STND-XX, RUGGEDCOM RS900W, RUGGEDCOM RS910, RUGGEDCOM RS910L, RUGGEDCOM RS910W, RUGGEDCOM RS920L, RUGGEDCOM RS920W, RUGGEDCOM RS930L, RUGGEDCOM RS930W, RUGGEDCOM RS940G, RUGGEDCOM RS940GF, RUGGEDCOM RS969, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100F, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100PF, RUGGEDCOM RSG2200, RUGGEDCOM RSG2200F, RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300F, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300PF, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488F, RUGGEDCOM RSG907R, RUGGEDCOM RSG908C, RUGGEDCOM RSG909R, RUGGEDCOM RSG910C, RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSL910, RUGGEDCOM RST2228, RUGGEDCOM RST2228P, RUGGEDCOM RST916C, RUGGEDCOM RST916P. A new variant of the POODLE attack has left a third-party component vulnerable due to the implementation flaws of the CBC encryption mode in TLS 1.0 to 1.2. If an attacker were to exploit this, they could act as a man-in-the-middle and eavesdrop on encrypted communications. | |||||
| CVE-2018-8034 | 4 Apache, Canonical, Debian and 1 more | 4 Tomcat, Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux and 1 more | 2023-12-08 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| The host name verification when using TLS with the WebSocket client was missing. It is now enabled by default. Versions Affected: Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.9, 8.5.0 to 8.5.31, 8.0.0.RC1 to 8.0.52, and 7.0.35 to 7.0.88. | |||||
| CVE-2023-4586 | 2 Infinispan, Redhat | 2 Hot Rod, Data Grid | 2023-12-06 | N/A | 7.4 HIGH |
| A vulnerability was found in the Hot Rod client. This security issue occurs as the Hot Rod client does not enable hostname validation when using TLS, possibly resulting in a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack. | |||||