Total
446 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-1563 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2023-11-07 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 3.7 LOW |
| In situations where an attacker receives automated notification of the success or failure of a decryption attempt an attacker, after sending a very large number of messages to be decrypted, can recover a CMS/PKCS7 transported encryption key or decrypt any RSA encrypted message that was encrypted with the public RSA key, using a Bleichenbacher padding oracle attack. Applications are not affected if they use a certificate together with the private RSA key to the CMS_decrypt or PKCS7_decrypt functions to select the correct recipient info to decrypt. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1d (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1c). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0l (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0k). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2t (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2s). | |||||
| CVE-2019-1543 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2023-11-07 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 7.4 HIGH |
| ChaCha20-Poly1305 is an AEAD cipher, and requires a unique nonce input for every encryption operation. RFC 7539 specifies that the nonce value (IV) should be 96 bits (12 bytes). OpenSSL allows a variable nonce length and front pads the nonce with 0 bytes if it is less than 12 bytes. However it also incorrectly allows a nonce to be set of up to 16 bytes. In this case only the last 12 bytes are significant and any additional leading bytes are ignored. It is a requirement of using this cipher that nonce values are unique. Messages encrypted using a reused nonce value are susceptible to serious confidentiality and integrity attacks. If an application changes the default nonce length to be longer than 12 bytes and then makes a change to the leading bytes of the nonce expecting the new value to be a new unique nonce then such an application could inadvertently encrypt messages with a reused nonce. Additionally the ignored bytes in a long nonce are not covered by the integrity guarantee of this cipher. Any application that relies on the integrity of these ignored leading bytes of a long nonce may be further affected. Any OpenSSL internal use of this cipher, including in SSL/TLS, is safe because no such use sets such a long nonce value. However user applications that use this cipher directly and set a non-default nonce length to be longer than 12 bytes may be vulnerable. OpenSSL versions 1.1.1 and 1.1.0 are affected by this issue. Due to the limited scope of affected deployments this has been assessed as low severity and therefore we are not creating new releases at this time. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1c (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1b). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0k (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0j). | |||||
| CVE-2019-16863 | 1 St | 8 St33tphf20i2c, St33tphf20i2c Firmware, St33tphf20spi and 5 more | 2023-11-07 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| STMicroelectronics ST33TPHF2ESPI TPM devices before 2019-09-12 allow attackers to extract the ECDSA private key via a side-channel timing attack because ECDSA scalar multiplication is mishandled, aka TPM-FAIL. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11323 | 1 Haproxy | 1 Haproxy | 2023-11-07 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| HAProxy before 1.9.7 mishandles a reload with rotated keys, which triggers use of uninitialized, and very predictable, HMAC keys. This is related to an include/types/ssl_sock.h error. | |||||
| CVE-2019-0030 | 1 Juniper | 3 Advanced Threat Prevention Firmware, Atp400, Atp700 | 2023-11-07 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| Juniper ATP uses DES and a hardcoded salt for password hashing, allowing for trivial de-hashing of the password file contents. This issue affects Juniper ATP 5.0 versions prior to 5.0.3. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1000180 | 5 Bouncycastle, Debian, Netapp and 2 more | 21 Fips Java Api, Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api, Debian Linux and 18 more | 2023-11-07 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Bouncy Castle BC 1.54 - 1.59, BC-FJA 1.0.0, BC-FJA 1.0.1 and earlier have a flaw in the Low-level interface to RSA key pair generator, specifically RSA Key Pairs generated in low-level API with added certainty may have less M-R tests than expected. This appears to be fixed in versions BC 1.60 beta 4 and later, BC-FJA 1.0.2 and later. | |||||
| CVE-2018-0737 | 2 Canonical, Openssl | 2 Ubuntu Linux, Openssl | 2023-11-07 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| The OpenSSL RSA Key generation algorithm has been shown to be vulnerable to a cache timing side channel attack. An attacker with sufficient access to mount cache timing attacks during the RSA key generation process could recover the private key. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0i-dev (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0h). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2p-dev (Affected 1.0.2b-1.0.2o). | |||||
| CVE-2018-0735 | 6 Canonical, Debian, Netapp and 3 more | 23 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Cloud Backup and 20 more | 2023-11-07 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| The OpenSSL ECDSA signature algorithm has been shown to be vulnerable to a timing side channel attack. An attacker could use variations in the signing algorithm to recover the private key. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0j (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0i). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1a (Affected 1.1.1). | |||||
| CVE-2018-0734 | 6 Canonical, Debian, Netapp and 3 more | 20 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Cloud Backup and 17 more | 2023-11-07 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| The OpenSSL DSA signature algorithm has been shown to be vulnerable to a timing side channel attack. An attacker could use variations in the signing algorithm to recover the private key. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1a (Affected 1.1.1). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0j (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0i). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2q (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2p). | |||||
| CVE-2017-5186 | 2 Netiq, Novell | 4 Edirectory, Imanager, Edirectory and 1 more | 2023-11-07 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Novell iManager 2.7 before SP7 Patch 9, NetIQ iManager 3.x before 3.0.2.1, Novell eDirectory 8.8.x before 8.8 SP8 Patch 9 Hotfix 2, and NetIQ eDirectory 9.x before 9.0.2 Hotfix 2 (9.0.2.2) use the deprecated MD5 hashing algorithm in a communications certificate. | |||||
| CVE-2012-4449 | 1 Apache | 1 Hadoop | 2023-11-07 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Apache Hadoop before 0.23.4, 1.x before 1.0.4, and 2.x before 2.0.2 generate token passwords using a 20-bit secret when Kerberos security features are enabled, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to crack secret keys via a brute-force attack. | |||||
| CVE-2023-22812 | 1 Westerndigital | 1 Sandisk Privateaccess | 2023-11-04 | N/A | 7.4 HIGH |
| SanDisk PrivateAccess versions prior to 6.4.9 support insecure TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1 protocols which are susceptible to man-in-the-middle attacks thereby compromising confidentiality and integrity of data. | |||||
| CVE-2021-3979 | 2 Fedoraproject, Redhat | 8 Fedora, Ceph Storage, Ceph Storage For Ibm Z Systems and 5 more | 2023-10-23 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| A key length flaw was found in Red Hat Ceph Storage. An attacker can exploit the fact that the key length is incorrectly passed in an encryption algorithm to create a non random key, which is weaker and can be exploited for loss of confidentiality and integrity on encrypted disks. | |||||
| CVE-2023-30994 | 2 Ibm, Linux | 2 Qradar Security Information And Event Manager, Linux Kernel | 2023-10-18 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| IBM QRadar SIEM 7.5.0 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 254138 | |||||
| CVE-2020-26515 | 1 Intland | 1 Codebeamer | 2023-10-18 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An insufficiently protected credentials issue was discovered in Intland codeBeamer ALM 10.x through 10.1.SP4. The remember-me cookie (CB_LOGIN) issued by the application contains the encrypted user's credentials. However, due to a bug in the application code, those credentials are encrypted using a NULL encryption key. | |||||
| CVE-2022-33160 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Directory Suite Va | 2023-10-10 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| IBM Security Directory Suite 8.0.1 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 228568. | |||||
| CVE-2023-43635 | 1 Linuxfoundation | 1 Edge Virtualization Engine | 2023-09-28 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Vault Key Sealed With SHA1 PCRs The measured boot solution implemented in EVE OS leans on a PCR locking mechanism. Different parts of the system update different PCR values in the TPM, resulting in a unique value for each PCR entry. These PCRs are then used in order to seal/unseal a key from the TPM which is used to encrypt/decrypt the “vault” directory. This “vault” directory is the most sensitive point in the system and as such, its content should be protected. This mechanism is noted in Zededa’s documentation as the “measured boot” mechanism, designed to protect said “vault”. The code that’s responsible for generating and fetching the key from the TPM assumes that SHA256 PCRs are used in order to seal/unseal the key, and as such their presence is being checked. The issue here is that the key is not sealed using SHA256 PCRs, but using SHA1 PCRs. This leads to several issues: • Machines that have their SHA256 PCRs enabled but SHA1 PCRs disabled, as well as not sealing their keys at all, meaning the “vault” is not protected from an attacker. • SHA1 is considered insecure and reduces the complexity level required to unseal the key in machines which have their SHA1 PCRs enabled. An attacker can very easily retrieve the contents of the “vault”, which will effectively render the “measured boot” mechanism meaningless. | |||||
| CVE-2023-39252 | 1 Dell | 1 Secure Connect Gateway Policy Manager | 2023-09-23 | N/A | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| Dell SCG Policy Manager 5.16.00.14 contains a broken cryptographic algorithm vulnerability. A remote unauthenticated attacker may potentially exploit this vulnerability by performing MitM attacks and let attackers obtain sensitive information. | |||||
| CVE-2023-37464 | 1 Cisco | 1 Cjose | 2023-09-15 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| OpenIDC/cjose is a C library implementing the Javascript Object Signing and Encryption (JOSE). The AES GCM decryption routine incorrectly uses the Tag length from the actual Authentication Tag provided in the JWE. The spec says that a fixed length of 16 octets must be applied. Therefore this bug allows an attacker to provide a truncated Authentication Tag and to modify the JWE accordingly. Users should upgrade to a version >= 0.6.2.2. Users unable to upgrade should avoid using AES GCM encryption and replace it with another encryption algorithm (e.g. AES CBC). | |||||
| CVE-2023-34758 | 1 Bishopfox | 1 Sliver | 2023-09-12 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| Sliver from v1.5.x to v1.5.39 has an improper cryptographic implementation, which allows attackers to execute a man-in-the-middle attack via intercepted and crafted responses. | |||||