Total
2641 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-36715 | 1 Xootix | 1 Login\/signup Popup | 2023-11-07 | N/A | 4.6 MEDIUM |
| The Login/Signup Popup plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authorization bypass due to missing capability checks on several functions in versions up to, and including, 1.4. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts into the plugin settings that execute if they can successfully trick a user into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2020-36712 | 1 Kaliforms | 1 Kali Forms | 2023-11-07 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| The Kali Forms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Unauthenticated Arbitrary Post Deletion in versions up to, and including, 2.1.1. This is due to the kaliforms_form_delete_uploaded_file function lacking any privilege or user protections. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete any site post or page with the id parameter. | |||||
| CVE-2020-36702 | 1 Brainstormforce | 1 Spectra | 2023-11-07 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| The Ultimate Addons for Gutenberg plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Authenticated Settings Change in versions up to, and including, 1.14.7. This is due to missing capability checks on several AJAX actions. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers with subscriber+ roles to update the plugin's settings. | |||||
| CVE-2020-36699 | 1 Quick Page\/post Redirect Project | 1 Quick Page\/post Redirect | 2023-11-07 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| The Quick Page/Post Redirect Plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authorization bypass due to missing capability checks on the qppr_save_quick_redirect_ajax and qppr_delete_quick_redirect functions in versions up to, and including, 5.1.9. This makes it possible for low-privileged attackers to interact with the plugin settings and to create a redirect link that would forward all traffic to an external malicious website. | |||||
| CVE-2020-36698 | 1 Cleantalk | 1 Security \& Malware Scan | 2023-11-07 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| The Security & Malware scan by CleanTalk plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized user interaction in versions up to, and including, 2.50. This is due to missing capability checks on several AJAX actions and nonce disclosure in the source page of the administrative dashboard. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level permissions and above, to call functions and delete and/or upload files. | |||||
| CVE-2020-36697 | 1 Appsaloon | 1 Wp Gdpr | 2023-11-07 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| The WP GDPR plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authorization bypass due to a missing capability check in versions up to, and including, 2.1.1. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete any comment and modify the plugin’s settings. | |||||
| CVE-2020-36696 | 1 Tychesoftwares | 1 Product Input Fields For Woocommerce | 2023-11-07 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| The Product Input Fields for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authorization bypass due to a missing capability check on the handle_downloads() function in versions up to, and including, 1.2.6. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to download files from the vulnerable service. | |||||
| CVE-2020-29480 | 3 Debian, Fedoraproject, Xen | 3 Debian Linux, Fedora, Xen | 2023-11-07 | 2.1 LOW | 2.3 LOW |
| An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.14.x. Neither xenstore implementation does any permission checks when reporting a xenstore watch event. A guest administrator can watch the root xenstored node, which will cause notifications for every created, modified, and deleted key. A guest administrator can also use the special watches, which will cause a notification every time a domain is created and destroyed. Data may include: number, type, and domids of other VMs; existence and domids of driver domains; numbers of virtual interfaces, block devices, vcpus; existence of virtual framebuffers and their backend style (e.g., existence of VNC service); Xen VM UUIDs for other domains; timing information about domain creation and device setup; and some hints at the backend provisioning of VMs and their devices. The watch events do not contain values stored in xenstore, only key names. A guest administrator can observe non-sensitive domain and device lifecycle events relating to other guests. This information allows some insight into overall system configuration (including the number and general nature of other guests), and configuration of other guests (including the number and general nature of other guests' devices). This information might be commercially interesting or might make other attacks easier. There is not believed to be exposure of sensitive data. Specifically, there is no exposure of VNC passwords, port numbers, pathnames in host and guest filesystems, cryptographic keys, or within-guest data. | |||||
| CVE-2020-29479 | 3 Debian, Fedoraproject, Xen | 3 Debian Linux, Fedora, Xen | 2023-11-07 | 7.2 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.14.x. In the Ocaml xenstored implementation, the internal representation of the tree has special cases for the root node, because this node has no parent. Unfortunately, permissions were not checked for certain operations on the root node. Unprivileged guests can get and modify permissions, list, and delete the root node. (Deleting the whole xenstore tree is a host-wide denial of service.) Achieving xenstore write access is also possible. All systems using oxenstored are vulnerable. Building and using oxenstored is the default in the upstream Xen distribution, if the Ocaml compiler is available. Systems using C xenstored are not vulnerable. | |||||
| CVE-2020-28368 | 3 Debian, Fedoraproject, Xen | 3 Debian Linux, Fedora, Xen | 2023-11-07 | 2.1 LOW | 4.4 MEDIUM |
| Xen through 4.14.x allows guest OS administrators to obtain sensitive information (such as AES keys from outside the guest) via a side-channel attack on a power/energy monitoring interface, aka a "Platypus" attack. NOTE: there is only one logically independent fix: to change the access control for each such interface in Xen. | |||||
| CVE-2020-28036 | 3 Debian, Fedoraproject, Wordpress | 3 Debian Linux, Fedora, Wordpress | 2023-11-07 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| wp-includes/class-wp-xmlrpc-server.php in WordPress before 5.5.2 allows attackers to gain privileges by using XML-RPC to comment on a post. | |||||
| CVE-2020-24614 | 3 Fedoraproject, Fossil-scm, Opensuse | 4 Fedora, Fossil, Backports Sle and 1 more | 2023-11-07 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Fossil before 2.10.2, 2.11.x before 2.11.2, and 2.12.x before 2.12.1 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code. An attacker must have check-in privileges on the repository. | |||||
| CVE-2020-1963 | 1 Apache | 1 Ignite | 2023-11-07 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| Apache Ignite uses H2 database to build SQL distributed execution engine. H2 provides SQL functions which could be used by attacker to access to a filesystem. | |||||
| CVE-2020-1720 | 2 Postgresql, Redhat | 4 Postgresql, Decision Manager, Enterprise Linux and 1 more | 2023-11-07 | 3.5 LOW | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| A flaw was found in PostgreSQL's "ALTER ... DEPENDS ON EXTENSION", where sub-commands did not perform authorization checks. An authenticated attacker could use this flaw in certain configurations to perform drop objects such as function, triggers, et al., leading to database corruption. This issue affects PostgreSQL versions before 12.2, before 11.7, before 10.12 and before 9.6.17. | |||||
| CVE-2020-14001 | 4 Canonical, Debian, Fedoraproject and 1 more | 4 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Fedora and 1 more | 2023-11-07 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| The kramdown gem before 2.3.0 for Ruby processes the template option inside Kramdown documents by default, which allows unintended read access (such as template="/etc/passwd") or unintended embedded Ruby code execution (such as a string that begins with template="string://<%= `). NOTE: kramdown is used in Jekyll, GitLab Pages, GitHub Pages, and Thredded Forum. | |||||
| CVE-2020-13938 | 4 Apache, Mcafee, Microsoft and 1 more | 4 Http Server, Epolicy Orchestrator, Windows and 1 more | 2023-11-07 | 2.1 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| Apache HTTP Server versions 2.4.0 to 2.4.46 Unprivileged local users can stop httpd on Windows | |||||
| CVE-2020-13626 | 1 Oneplus | 1 App Locker | 2023-11-07 | 2.1 LOW | 4.6 MEDIUM |
| OnePlus App Locker through 2020-10-06 allows physically proximate attackers to use Google Assistant to bypass an authorization check in order to send an SMS message when the SMS application is locked. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10697 | 1 Redhat | 1 Ansible Tower | 2023-11-07 | 3.6 LOW | 4.4 MEDIUM |
| A flaw was found in Ansible Tower when running Openshift. Tower runs a memcached, which is accessed via TCP. An attacker can take advantage of writing a playbook polluting this cache, causing a denial of service attack. This attack would not completely stop the service, but in the worst-case scenario, it can reduce the Tower performance, for which memcached is designed. Theoretically, more sophisticated attacks can be performed by manipulating and crafting the cache, as Tower relies on memcached as a place to pull out setting values. Confidential and sensitive data stored in memcached should not be pulled, as this information is encrypted. This flaw affects Ansible Tower versions before 3.6.4, Ansible Tower versions before 3.5.6 and Ansible Tower versions before 3.4.6. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10689 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Che | 2023-11-07 | 4.9 MEDIUM | 6.8 MEDIUM |
| A flaw was found in the Eclipse Che up to version 7.8.x, where it did not properly restrict access to workspace pods. An authenticated user can exploit this flaw to bypass JWT proxy and gain access to the workspace pods of another user. Successful exploitation requires knowledge of the service name and namespace of the target pod. | |||||
| CVE-2020-10684 | 3 Debian, Fedoraproject, Redhat | 5 Debian Linux, Fedora, Ansible and 2 more | 2023-11-07 | 3.6 LOW | 7.1 HIGH |
| A flaw was found in Ansible Engine, all versions 2.7.x, 2.8.x and 2.9.x prior to 2.7.17, 2.8.9 and 2.9.6 respectively, when using ansible_facts as a subkey of itself and promoting it to a variable when inject is enabled, overwriting the ansible_facts after the clean. An attacker could take advantage of this by altering the ansible_facts, such as ansible_hosts, users and any other key data which would lead into privilege escalation or code injection. | |||||