Total
2641 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-22478 | 1 Fit2cloud | 1 Kubepi | 2023-01-24 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| KubePi is a modern Kubernetes panel. The API interfaces with unauthorized entities and may leak sensitive information. This issue has been patched in version 1.6.4. There are currently no known workarounds. | |||||
| CVE-2021-32503 | 1 Sick | 2 Ftmg, Ftmg Firmware | 2023-01-24 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.9 MEDIUM |
| Unauthenticated users can access sensitive web URLs through GET request, which should be restricted to maintenance users only. A malicious attacker could use this sensitive information’s to launch further attacks on the system. | |||||
| CVE-2023-22488 | 1 Flarum | 1 Flarum | 2023-01-23 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Flarum is a forum software for building communities. Using the notifications feature, one can read restricted/private content and bypass access checks that would be in place for such content. The notification-sending component does not check that the subject of the notification can be seen by the receiver, and proceeds to send notifications through their different channels. The alerts do not leak data despite this as they are listed based on a visibility check, however, emails are still sent out. This means that, for extensions which restrict access to posts, any actor can bypass the restriction by subscribing to the discussion if the Subscriptions extension is enabled. The attack allows the leaking of some posts in the forum database, including posts awaiting approval, posts in tags the user has no access to if they could subscribe to a discussion before it becomes private, and posts restricted by third-party extensions. All Flarum versions prior to v1.6.3 are affected. The vulnerability has been fixed and published as flarum/core v1.6.3. All communities running Flarum should upgrade as soon as possible to v1.6.3. As a workaround, disable the Flarum Subscriptions extension or disable email notifications altogether. There are no other supported workarounds for this issue for Flarum versions below 1.6.3. | |||||
| CVE-2021-24352 | 1 Wpdeveloper | 1 Simple 301 Redirects | 2023-01-20 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| The export_data function of the Simple 301 Redirects by BetterLinks WordPress plugin before 2.0.4 had no capability or nonce checks making it possible for unauthenticated users to export a site's redirects. | |||||
| CVE-2021-24353 | 1 Wpdeveloper | 1 Simple 301 Redirects | 2023-01-20 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| The import_data function of the Simple 301 Redirects by BetterLinks WordPress plugin before 2.0.4 had no capability or nonce checks making it possible for unauthenticated users to import a set of site redirects. | |||||
| CVE-2021-3656 | 3 Fedoraproject, Linux, Redhat | 26 Fedora, Linux Kernel, 3scale Api Management and 23 more | 2023-01-19 | 7.2 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| A flaw was found in the KVM's AMD code for supporting SVM nested virtualization. The flaw occurs when processing the VMCB (virtual machine control block) provided by the L1 guest to spawn/handle a nested guest (L2). Due to improper validation of the "virt_ext" field, this issue could allow a malicious L1 to disable both VMLOAD/VMSAVE intercepts and VLS (Virtual VMLOAD/VMSAVE) for the L2 guest. As a result, the L2 guest would be allowed to read/write physical pages of the host, resulting in a crash of the entire system, leak of sensitive data or potential guest-to-host escape. | |||||
| CVE-2022-39094 | 2 Google, Unisoc | 14 Android, S8000, Sc7731e and 11 more | 2023-01-10 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In power management service, there is a missing permission check. This could lead to set up power management service with no additional execution privileges needed. | |||||
| CVE-2022-39095 | 2 Google, Unisoc | 14 Android, S8000, Sc7731e and 11 more | 2023-01-10 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In power management service, there is a missing permission check. This could lead to set up power management service with no additional execution privileges needed. | |||||
| CVE-2022-39096 | 2 Google, Unisoc | 14 Android, S8000, Sc7731e and 11 more | 2023-01-10 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In power management service, there is a missing permission check. This could lead to set up power management service with no additional execution privileges needed. | |||||
| CVE-2022-39097 | 2 Google, Unisoc | 14 Android, S8000, Sc7731e and 11 more | 2023-01-10 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In power management service, there is a missing permission check. This could lead to set up power management service with no additional execution privileges needed. | |||||
| CVE-2022-39098 | 2 Google, Unisoc | 14 Android, S8000, Sc7731e and 11 more | 2023-01-10 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In power management service, there is a missing permission check. This could lead to set up power management service with no additional execution privileges needed. | |||||
| CVE-2022-39099 | 2 Google, Unisoc | 14 Android, S8000, Sc7731e and 11 more | 2023-01-10 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In power management service, there is a missing permission check. This could lead to set up power management service with no additional execution privileges needed. | |||||
| CVE-2022-39100 | 2 Google, Unisoc | 14 Android, S8000, Sc7731e and 11 more | 2023-01-10 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In power management service, there is a missing permission check. This could lead to set up power management service with no additional execution privileges needed. | |||||
| CVE-2022-39101 | 2 Google, Unisoc | 14 Android, S8000, Sc7731e and 11 more | 2023-01-10 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In power management service, there is a missing permission check. This could lead to set up power management service with no additional execution privileges needed. | |||||
| CVE-2022-39102 | 2 Google, Unisoc | 14 Android, S8000, Sc7731e and 11 more | 2023-01-10 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In power management service, there is a missing permission check. This could lead to set up power management service with no additional execution privileges needed. | |||||
| CVE-2022-42777 | 2 Google, Unisoc | 14 Android, S8000, Sc7731e and 11 more | 2023-01-10 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In power management service, there is a missing permission check. This could lead to set up power management service with no additional execution privileges needed. | |||||
| CVE-2022-44435 | 2 Google, Unisoc | 14 Android, S8000, Sc7731e and 11 more | 2023-01-10 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| In messaging service, there is a missing permission check. This could lead to local denial of service in contacts service with no additional execution privileges needed. | |||||
| CVE-2022-44434 | 2 Google, Unisoc | 14 Android, S8000, Sc7731e and 11 more | 2023-01-10 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| In messaging service, there is a missing permission check. This could lead to local denial of service in contacts service with no additional execution privileges needed. | |||||
| CVE-2022-44439 | 2 Google, Unisoc | 14 Android, S8000, Sc7731e and 11 more | 2023-01-10 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| In messaging service, there is a missing permission check. This could lead to local denial of service in contacts service with no additional execution privileges needed. | |||||
| CVE-2022-44438 | 2 Google, Unisoc | 14 Android, S8000, Sc7731e and 11 more | 2023-01-10 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| In messaging service, there is a missing permission check. This could lead to local denial of service in contacts service with no additional execution privileges needed. | |||||