Total
518 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-6660 | 1 F5 | 13 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 10 more | 2019-11-19 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| On BIG-IP 14.1.0-14.1.2, 14.0.0-14.0.1, and 13.1.0-13.1.1, undisclosed HTTP requests may consume excessive amounts of systems resources which may lead to a denial of service. | |||||
| CVE-2019-6661 | 1 F5 | 1 Big-ip Access Policy Manager | 2019-11-19 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| When the BIG-IP APM 14.1.0-14.1.2, 14.0.0-14.0.1, 13.1.0-13.1.3.1, 12.1.0-12.1.4.1, or 11.5.1-11.6.5 system processes certain requests, the APD/APMD daemon may consume excessive resources. | |||||
| CVE-2019-6662 | 1 F5 | 13 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 10 more | 2019-11-18 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| On BIG-IP 13.1.0-13.1.1.4, sensitive information is logged into the local log files and/or remote logging targets when restjavad processes an invalid request. Users with access to the log files would be able to view that data. | |||||
| CVE-2019-6657 | 1 F5 | 13 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 10 more | 2019-11-05 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| On BIG-IP 13.1.0-13.1.3.1, 12.1.0-12.1.5, and 11.5.2-11.6.5.1, a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in an undisclosed page of the BIG-IP Traffic Management User Interface (TMUI), also known as the BIG-IP Configuration utility. | |||||
| CVE-2017-6147 | 1 F5 | 10 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 7 more | 2019-10-03 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| In F5 BIG-IP LTM, AAM, AFM, Analytics, APM, ASM, DNS, Link Controller, PEM, and WebSafe 12.1.2-HF1 and 13.0.0, an undisclosed type of responses may cause TMM to restart, causing an interruption of service when "SSL Forward Proxy" setting is enabled in both the Client and Server SSL profiles assigned to a BIG-IP Virtual Server. | |||||
| CVE-2018-15327 | 1 F5 | 14 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 11 more | 2019-10-03 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| In BIG-IP 14.0.0-14.0.0.2 or 13.0.0-13.1.1.1 or Enterprise Manager 3.1.1, when authenticated administrative users run commands in the Traffic Management User Interface (TMUI), also referred to as the BIG-IP Configuration utility, restrictions on allowed commands may not be enforced. | |||||
| CVE-2018-5504 | 1 F5 | 13 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 10 more | 2019-10-03 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.1 HIGH |
| In some circumstances, the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) does not properly handle certain malformed Websockets requests/responses, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial-of-service (DoS) or possible remote code execution on the F5 BIG-IP system running versions 13.0.0 - 13.1.0.3 or 12.1.0 - 12.1.3.1. | |||||
| CVE-2018-5527 | 1 F5 | 13 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 10 more | 2019-10-03 | 7.8 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| On BIG-IP 13.1.0-13.1.0.7, a remote attacker using undisclosed methods against virtual servers configured with a Client SSL or Server SSL profile that has the SSL Forward Proxy feature enabled can force the Traffic Management Microkernel (tmm) to leak memory. As a result, system memory usage increases over time, which may eventually cause a decrease in performance or a system reboot due to memory exhaustion. | |||||
| CVE-2017-6135 | 1 F5 | 11 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 8 more | 2019-10-03 | 7.8 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| In F5 BIG-IP LTM, AAM, AFM, Analytics, APM, ASM, DNS, GTM, Link Controller, PEM and WebSafe software version 13.0.0, a slow memory leak as a result of undisclosed IPv4 or IPv6 packets sent to BIG-IP management port or self IP addresses may lead to out of memory (OOM) conditions. | |||||
| CVE-2018-15316 | 1 F5 | 3 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Access Policy Manager Client, Big-ip Edge Client | 2019-10-03 | 2.1 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| In F5 BIG-IP APM 13.0.0-13.1.1.1, APM Client 7.1.5-7.1.6, and/or Edge Client 7101-7160, the BIG-IP APM Edge Client component loads the policy library with user permission and bypassing the endpoint checks. | |||||
| CVE-2017-6137 | 1 F5 | 11 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 8 more | 2019-10-03 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| In F5 BIG-IP LTM, AAM, AFM, Analytics, APM, ASM, DNS, Edge Gateway, GTM, Link Controller, PEM, PSM, WebAccelerator, and WebSafe 11.6.1 HF1, 12.0.0 HF3, 12.0.0 HF4, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.2, undisclosed traffic patterns received while software SYN cookie protection is engaged may cause a disruption of service to the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) on specific platforms and configurations. | |||||
| CVE-2017-6159 | 1 F5 | 8 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Application Acceleration Manager and 5 more | 2019-10-03 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| F5 BIG-IP LTM, AAM, AFM, Analytics, APM, ASM, DNS, GTM, Link Controller, PEM, Websafe software version 12.0.0 to 12.1.2, 11.6.0 to 11.6.1 are vulnerable to a denial of service attack when the MPTCP option is enabled on a virtual server. Data plane is vulnerable when using the MPTCP option of a TCP profile. There is no control plane exposure. An attacker may be able to disrupt services by causing TMM to restart hence temporarily failing to process traffic. | |||||
| CVE-2017-0301 | 1 F5 | 1 Big-ip Access Policy Manager | 2019-10-03 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 7.6 HIGH |
| In F5 BIG-IP APM software versions 11.5.0, 11.5.1, 11.5.2, 11.5.3, 11.5.4, 11.6.0, 11.6.1, 12.0.0, 12.1.0, 12.1.1 and 12.1.2 BIG-IP APM portal access requests do not return the intended resources in some cases. This may allow access to internal BIG-IP APM resources, however the application resources and backend servers are unaffected. | |||||
| CVE-2017-6156 | 1 F5 | 13 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 10 more | 2019-10-03 | 6.0 MEDIUM | 6.4 MEDIUM |
| When the F5 BIG-IP 12.1.0-12.1.1, 11.6.0-11.6.1, 11.5.1-11.5.5, or 11.2.1 system is configured with a wildcard IPSec tunnel endpoint, it may allow a remote attacker to disrupt or impersonate the tunnels that have completed phase 1 IPSec negotiations. The attacker must possess the necessary credentials to negotiate the phase 1 of the IPSec exchange to exploit this vulnerability; in many environment this limits the attack surface to other endpoints under the same administration. | |||||
| CVE-2017-6151 | 1 F5 | 13 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 10 more | 2019-10-03 | 7.8 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| In F5 BIG-IP LTM, AAM, AFM, Analytics, APM, ASM, DNS, Edge Gateway, GTM, Link Controller, PEM, WebAccelerator and WebSafe software version 13.0.0, undisclosed requests made to BIG-IP virtual servers which make use of the "HTTP/2 profile" may result in a disruption of service to TMM. | |||||
| CVE-2018-5524 | 1 F5 | 11 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 8 more | 2019-10-03 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Under certain conditions, on F5 BIG-IP 13.0.0-13.1.0.5, 12.1.0-12.1.3.1, or 11.6.1 HF2-11.6.3.1, virtual servers configured with Client SSL or Server SSL profiles which make use of network hardware security module (HSM) functionality are exposed and impacted by this issue. | |||||
| CVE-2018-5518 | 1 F5 | 13 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 10 more | 2019-10-03 | 2.3 LOW | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| On F5 BIG-IP 13.0.0-13.1.0.5 or 12.0.0-12.1.3.3, malicious root users with access to a VCMP guest can cause a disruption of service on adjacent VCMP guests running on the same host. Exploiting this vulnerability causes the vCMPd process on the adjacent VCMP guest to restart and produce a core file. This issue is only exploitable on a VCMP guest which is operating in "host-only" or "bridged" mode. VCMP guests which are "isolated" are not impacted by this issue and do not provide mechanism to exploit the vulnerability. Guests which are deployed in "Appliance Mode" may be impacted however the exploit is not possible from an Appliance Mode guest. To exploit this vulnerability root access on a guest system deployed as "host-only" or "bridged" mode is required. | |||||
| CVE-2017-6155 | 1 F5 | 11 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Application Acceleration Manager and 8 more | 2019-10-03 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| On F5 BIG-IP 13.0.0, 12.0.0-12.1.3.1, 11.6.0-11.6.2, 11.4.1-11.5.5, or 11.2.1, malformed SPDY or HTTP/2 requests may result in a disruption of service to TMM. Data plane is only exposed when a SPDY or HTTP/2 profile is attached to a virtual server. There is no control plane exposure. | |||||
| CVE-2017-6153 | 1 F5 | 13 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 10 more | 2019-10-03 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Features in F5 BIG-IP 13.0.0-13.1.0.3, 12.1.0-12.1.3.1, 11.6.1-11.6.3.1, 11.5.1-11.5.5, or 11.2.1 system that utilizes inflate functionality directly, via an iRule, or via the inflate code from PEM module are subjected to a service disruption via a "Zip Bomb" attack. | |||||
| CVE-2017-6157 | 1 F5 | 8 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Application Acceleration Manager and 5 more | 2019-10-03 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| In F5 BIG-IP LTM, AAM, AFM, Analytics, APM, ASM, DNS, GTM, Link Controller, PEM and Websafe software version 12.0.0 to 12.1.1, 11.6.0 to 11.6.1, 11.5.0 - 11.5.4, virtual servers with a configuration using the HTTP Explicit Proxy functionality and/or SOCKS profile are vulnerable to an unauthenticated, remote attack that allows modification of BIG-IP system configuration, extraction of sensitive system files, and/or possible remote command execution on the BIG-IP system. | |||||