Total
30 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2014-0160 | 11 Canonical, Debian, Fedoraproject and 8 more | 33 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Fedora and 30 more | 2023-11-07 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| The (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g do not properly handle Heartbeat Extension packets, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory via crafted packets that trigger a buffer over-read, as demonstrated by reading private keys, related to d1_both.c and t1_lib.c, aka the Heartbleed bug. | |||||
| CVE-2022-41326 | 1 Mitel | 1 Micollab | 2023-08-08 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| The web conferencing component of Mitel MiCollab through 9.6.0.13 could allow an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary scripts due to improper authorization controls. A successful exploit could allow remote code execution within the context of the application. | |||||
| CVE-2022-26143 | 1 Mitel | 2 Micollab, Mivoice Business Express | 2023-08-08 | 9.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| The TP-240 (aka tp240dvr) component in Mitel MiCollab before 9.4 SP1 FP1 and MiVoice Business Express through 8.1 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information and cause a denial of service (performance degradation and excessive outbound traffic). This was exploited in the wild in February and March 2022 for the TP240PhoneHome DDoS attack. | |||||
| CVE-2023-25597 | 1 Mitel | 1 Micollab | 2023-04-24 | N/A | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability in the web conferencing component of Mitel MiCollab through 9.6.2.9 could allow an unauthenticated attacker to download a shared file via a crafted request - including the exact path and filename - due to improper authentication control. A successful exploit could allow access to sensitive information. | |||||
| CVE-2022-36452 | 1 Mitel | 1 Micollab | 2022-10-31 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A vulnerability in the web conferencing component of Mitel MiCollab through 9.5.0.101 could allow an unauthenticated attacker to upload malicious files. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code within the context of the application. | |||||
| CVE-2022-36451 | 1 Mitel | 1 Micollab | 2022-10-28 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in the MiCollab Client server component of Mitel MiCollab through 9.5.0.101 could allow an authenticated attacker to conduct a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attack due to insufficient restriction of URL parameters. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to leverage connections and permissions available to the host server. | |||||
| CVE-2022-36454 | 1 Mitel | 1 Micollab | 2022-10-28 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability in the MiCollab Client API of Mitel MiCollab through 9.5.0.101 could allow an authenticated attacker to modify their profile parameters due to improper authorization controls. A successful exploit could allow the authenticated attacker to impersonate another user's name. | |||||
| CVE-2022-36453 | 1 Mitel | 1 Micollab | 2022-10-28 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in the MiCollab Client API of Mitel MiCollab 9.1.3 through 9.5.0.101 could allow an authenticated attacker to modify their profile parameters due to improper authorization controls. A successful exploit could allow the authenticated attacker to control another extension number. | |||||
| CVE-2021-32071 | 1 Mitel | 1 Micollab | 2022-05-03 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| The MiCollab Client service in Mitel MiCollab before 9.3 could allow an unauthenticated user to gain system access due to improper access control. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to view and modify application data, and cause a denial of service for users. | |||||
| CVE-2021-32072 | 1 Mitel | 1 Micollab | 2021-08-25 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| The MiCollab Client Service component in Mitel MiCollab before 9.3 could allow an attacker to get source code information (disclosing sensitive application data) due to insufficient output sanitization. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to view source code methods. | |||||
| CVE-2021-27401 | 1 Mitel | 1 Micollab | 2021-08-23 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| The Join Meeting page of Mitel MiCollab Web Client before 9.2 FP2 could allow an attacker to access (view and modify) user data by executing arbitrary code due to insufficient input validation, aka Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). | |||||
| CVE-2021-27402 | 1 Mitel | 1 Micollab | 2021-08-23 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| The SAS Admin portal of Mitel MiCollab before 9.2 FP2 could allow an unauthenticated attacker to access (view and modify) user data by injecting arbitrary directory paths due to improper URL validation, aka Directory Traversal. | |||||
| CVE-2021-32067 | 1 Mitel | 1 Micollab | 2021-08-23 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| The MiCollab Client Service component in Mitel MiCollab before 9.3 could allow an attacker to view sensitive system information through an HTTP response due to insufficient output sanitization. | |||||
| CVE-2021-32068 | 1 Mitel | 1 Micollab | 2021-08-23 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 3.7 LOW |
| The AWV and MiCollab Client Service components in Mitel MiCollab before 9.3 could allow an attacker to perform a Man-In-the-Middle attack by sending multiple session renegotiation requests, due to insufficient TLS session controls. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to modify application data and state. | |||||
| CVE-2021-32069 | 1 Mitel | 1 Micollab | 2021-08-23 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 4.8 MEDIUM |
| The AWV component of Mitel MiCollab before 9.3 could allow an attacker to perform a Man-In-the-Middle attack due to improper TLS negotiation. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to view and modify data. | |||||
| CVE-2021-32070 | 1 Mitel | 1 Micollab | 2021-08-23 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| The MiCollab Client Service component in Mitel MiCollab before 9.3 could allow an attacker to perform a clickjacking attack due to an insecure header response. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to modify the browser header and redirect users. | |||||
| CVE-2018-3639 | 12 Arm, Canonical, Debian and 9 more | 321 Cortex-a, Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux and 318 more | 2021-08-13 | 2.1 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and speculative execution of memory reads before the addresses of all prior memory writes are known may allow unauthorized disclosure of information to an attacker with local user access via a side-channel analysis, aka Speculative Store Bypass (SSB), Variant 4. | |||||
| CVE-2020-25606 | 1 Mitel | 1 Micollab | 2021-07-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| The AWV component of Mitel MiCollab before 9.2 could allow an attacker to view system information by sending arbitrary code due to improper input validation, aka XSS. | |||||
| CVE-2020-35547 | 1 Mitel | 1 Micollab | 2021-07-21 | 6.4 MEDIUM | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| A library index page in NuPoint Messenger in Mitel MiCollab before 9.2 FP1 could allow an unauthenticated attacker to gain access (view and modify) to user data. | |||||
| CVE-2020-25608 | 1 Mitel | 1 Micollab | 2021-07-21 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| The SAS portal of Mitel MiCollab before 9.2 could allow an attacker to access user credentials due to improper input validation, aka SQL Injection. | |||||